Why
I am not a Future-ist
Sam Ghandchi
http://www.ghandchi.com/1416-why-not-future-ist-english.htm
چرا آینده گرا نیستم
http://www.ghandchi.com/1416-why-not-future-ist.htm

About three years ago, I discussed the erroneous understanding of Modern
Futurism as some kind of "Future'ism" (1). In other words, the term
"futurist" should not be understood as "future-ist." In Persian language, the accepted
term is "ayandehnegar" which means forward-looking, and definitely does not
convey a sense of one having a certain future in mind-- striving to reach! The
issue is not just a difference of language and is a conceptual difference of
Modern Futurism and Utopianism, and not only this issue exists in many schools
of visionary futurism but is also present in analytic and participatory
futurism (2). The distinction can be observed in the discourse of futurist outlook
in various realms of knowledge.
During the last 40 years, I have delved into various aspects of this important
difference which actually separates Modern Futurism from many past Utopian
ideologies including Marxism (3). As futurists, we can even view distant futures
such as the option of "New Variant to Meet Human Needs" (4) while using a
"futurist" or a "future-ist" perspective and the result will
be different. The book entitled "Futurist Iran"(5)
actually uses a modern futurist outlook rather than a Utopian viewpoint, when
examining Iran's Revolution of 1979. I hope to find a publisher who would
be interested to make the new edition of the book
available in print.
What made the importance of the difference of Future-ism and futurism more clear
to me was thinking about "wheat and chessboard problem" and Ray Kurzweil's
"second half of the chessboard" story that relates to his law of accelerating
returns, of which Moore’s law is one of many examples (6). I have noticed when people set a future
goal for themselves, the path seems like "first half of the chessboard" whereas
when they embark on it, the journey becomes like what Kurzweil calls "second
half of the chess board."
Therefore, if people stick with their original goal and strive to get there,
their goal seems to get farther away, because as time passes, their journey will
become more of what Kurzweil calls "second half of the chessboard,"
and thus, using
"first half of the chessboard" view of reality makes the journey impossible, and
the travelers may end up like the religious, totalitarian or ideological regimes
which negate the future, as it unfolds, and are stuck in a "future" imagined long
time ago, thus destroying those wanting to look at future in the eye, in every
passing moment.
Hoping for a democratic and secular futurist republic in Iran,
http://www.ghandchi.com/index2.html
May 5, 2017
Footnotes:
1. Futurist Outlook and not Future'ism
http://www.ghandchi.com/822-futurist-outlook-english.htm
آینده نگری و نه آینده گرایی
http://www.ghandchi.com/822-futurist-outlook.htm
2. Modern Futurism
http://www.ghandchi.com/347-FuturismEng.htm
آینده نگری مدرن
http://www.ghandchi.com/347-Futurism.htm
3.
Marxist Thought & Monism
http://www.ghandchi.com/299-MarxismEng.htm
اندیشه مارکسیستی و مونیسم -یکتا گرائی
http://www.ghandchi.com/299-Marxism.htm
4. New Variant to Meet Human Needs-An Electronic Book
http://www.ghandchi.com/human-variant-book-english.htm
واریانت جدید برای تأمین نیازهای بشر- کتاب الکترونیک
http://www.ghandchi.com/human-variant-book.htm
5. FUTURIST IRAN: Futurism vs Terrorism-Third Edition
http://www.ghandchi.com/500-FuturistIranEng.htm
ایران آینده نگر: آینده نگری در برابر تروریسم
http://www.ghandchi.com/500-FuturistIran.htm
6. Wheat and chessboard problem
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheat_and_chessboard_problem
![]()
Related Discussions
Singularity Topics with Kurzweil's Comments
http://www.ghandchi.com/900-singularity-kurzweil-eng.htm
مباحث سینگولاریته با کامنت های کورزویل
http://www.ghandchi.com/900-singularity-kurzweil.htm
Featured Topics
http://featured.ghandchi.com
For a Secular Democratic & Futurist Republican Party in Iran
http://www.ghandchi.com/futuristparty/index.html
SEARCH